Seminar Newness-Wolfgang Suetzl

is something considered as new only because of compairism with the archive?

and when there is no archive, no compairism, , is then everything new or nothing?

who controls the archive? can they just control what is seen as new?

does the increasingly growing storage capacity of our modern archives necessarily go along with their decreasing durability

could there be something radically new hidden in the banal?

what will happen when we stop believing in the evidence?

if we follow the conception of radical doubt, why shouldn`t we doubt this conception?

could we just decide by choice what is new?

when something is different is it not radically new because it relates to something?We are moving towards cultural amnesia because technology is short lived compared to pen and paper.

Before the archive, production was repetitive to perpetuate tradition.

That which is new is that which needs to be preserved.

The M.F.A. is the new M.B.A.

Newness is radical authenticity.

Death of god is equal to a free spirit.

We are moving into an economy that is fictional.

Exchange of values makes it a good place for the death of god.

Industrial products are created in repetition. The original is lost.

Nietzsche is the man in the market place who declares, "God is dead!"

The Superman says god is dead, but the irony is, he also questions whether there is a god.

The mad man is Nietzsche.

Repetition is opposed to creativity.

Make the market your home.

It is true that there is no truth.

Cynicism vs. Romanticism

Kierkegaard: Whatever the truth is to you is not because of a logical explanation, it is a choice and nothing else.

There are no guidelines. you are out there alone with your own choice.

When you establish evidence you relinquish sovereignty, because you give over yourself to the evidence.

Radical doubt is the stuff of sovereignty.

Knowledge is inside us and when you recognize this it becomes the radical new.

The object only exists because of the story.

Infinity is the property of space.

Do digital works create their own time?

If the time of creation and consumption are the same, then it is difficult to separate out the creators and consumers. Cheryl Hirshman [7/08/09, 01:00]: Is it possible in the digital paradigm to have an archive?

Our cultural memory is getting shorter with digitalization.

Newness becomes an issue of space.

Auto-proetic

Wie geht es heute deinem Garten?

just kidding....

Can we compare the constant negociation of value on Nietzsche's Market place with the oscillation of the RAM?

"If our doubts result in something suspicious, how do we determine who of the wondering preachers is Jesus Christ? Which of the urinals is art?"

"How do you make an existential choice if you have to make a choice not guided by external evident knowledge?"

The genius artist, is one who channels the radical other, the intention: to serve without ego.

Homeless artist

Superman doesnt use Google

<<<<<<< Am I valuable enough to be archived?

Can I become a cult object?

“There is no newness” is a romantic cliché

The market is ugly and cruel and cynical

Newness is radical authenticity

The market is predicated on the death of God

======= <<<<<<< We are progressing toward a cultural amnesia due to the impermanence of media.

======= <<<<<<< Agnosticism is a shitty place to be.

======= If it's not archived, does it exist?

Real time is the consumption of time.

Philosophers are impotent >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> googlinging, superlinging, niesztchinlinging, geniulingling, settlinlgling, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>